Is It Bad to Use 3d Models for Art

It don't sound like your friend could exist that good of an creative person, because that is similar saying draw Johnny Depth but don't use a reference image, just draw what you know.

That is my take on that.
3D models are not great as a reference, considering you tin tell information technology is a 3d image. If yous recall it looks real and non 3D then you have a meliorate reference.

When y'all paint what y'all see no matter what it is it would be nothing without your skills, and the better you lot are the more than your fine art will expect exactly similar the reference. You can really steal art by drawing information technology, you would need to take the original. When you practice the work it is yours.

A lot of people similar to merits an artist steals the art by drawing their own version of it, simply nobody tin can mutter if it is a very bad copy of it. It is when they can't tell that it is non their art, because when you lot do the work to brand information technology look real you did more than work than the artist letting the figurer render it. A render is not what a lot of people think that word means, because rendering is a word that can exist replaced past "give" like the estimator renders the art, the computer gives you the art, or the computer is decorated giving you the art. You practise nil simply wait for it. This makes a rendered art less work than really painting it, considering when it is rendered the artist don't experience making every detail, while the artist painting it does remember making every detail, and was given a choice to include it or not, and make it look different because it didn't look right.
This is why I feel artist that paints the fine art has every correct to their work and someone snapping a picture, or rendering 3D has no right to all the work that artist put into their art.
It is never an exact copy, and the artist that painted it could point out things they excluded, or did different.

This is my version of Riddick, and I paused the dvd movie to paint this from a low quality plasma screen tv. It looked very rough, and I wanted to clean it up and make it look better. Hollywood Studios has the rights to the original epitome and information technology could look much better that the epitome I was using considering on the right side of the nose there was an prototype distortion that I imagined could be a scare from a clamper of missing skin that healed, but in real life Vin Diesel didn't have that scar, and in the motion they didn't add information technology. And so considering I could non see much peel texture from the distortion I painted smoother skin, and in that verbal frame where I got this, the artist missed painting his left middle with a smoothen, so I did and improved both eyes. Then, this is my version and in the original at that place were things backside him I didn't paint. I just filled in the surface area with black. When I asked Hollywood Studio for the right to sell my artwork they said nothing until I was more aggressive, and and so they said information technology is in their best interest to not annotate. And then, I had to remake this into another version and remove the grapheme, and create my ain to sell the prints.

I have a new monitor with back lighting and then I improved the original to expect bolder and less pale like this.

All artist has the right to the art they create, and nobody tin say unlike. Even Hollywood Studios volition not get into it with an creative person artwork fifty-fifty when they have the character rights, because later all is said and done through court and a lot of coin, the artist however volition have the rights to their own piece of work, and it don't matter how much information technology looks similar something, nobody can take that right away from the artist that really painted the piece of work and make information technology exist with their long hours, and skills.

When you are merely learning you lot tin can draw anything you lot experience tin can help you become a better artist, and that work forms a paper trail of what you lot did to become a better artist. Information technology don't affair if yous practiced doing Disney, Loonytoons, anime, or fence post in your dorsum one thousand, it is only used as a tool to help you become better, and in that location is no profit to share from that, unless other people want to share the cost of what it cost you to improve and learn.

If someone want to choice on something yous used to become a better creative person a long fourth dimension agone, just tell them that was years ago, because they accept no idea what your time to come holds, and you brand sure you lot will become much better at art, even if nobody can see that, you do. That is your whole reason to keep doing fine art, is to become the artist yous desire to exist, merely everyone will only see where you have been. Information technology is your paper trail that can be as bad as y'all excrement along the style for what is in your futurity.

So, practise everything y'all can to acquire, improve, and non listen to people, because they could never imagine what you need with things you experience can make yous better, like using 3D to acquire more about anatomy, and afterwards you can compare them to real life and improve where the 3D was wrong.

Every bit an artist wanting to become amend, you will need to face the fact that this is something yous are doing, and nobody wants to hang around while you practise information technology. It is a personal goal that makes you ameliorate, but information technology can exist lonely, and hopefully quiet and peaceful while yous focus deeper into the subjects y'all employ to learn from.

bailesbreparture.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.deviantart.com/forum/art/digital/2537783/